In Indian philosophy, the concept of Sabda pramana holds significant importance.
Sabda pramana refers to the authority of verbal testimony and is utilized to establish the acceptance of religious texts such as the Vedas, Upanishads, Smritis, Puranas, and Darshana shastras. It is considered reliable for acquiring knowledge of metaphysical entities.
However, there are certain critical perspectives regarding the concept of Sabda pramana. One such criticism is that Sabda pramana is comparatively less reliable and effective than other pramanas (means of knowledge) in Nyaya (Indian logic). The superiority and relative validity of Sabda pramana are subjects of ongoing debate and discussion in comparison to other pramanas.
Another critical aspect is that the claim for ultimate credibility of Sabda pramana necessitates basing its authority on tradition. While Sabda pramana holds a prominent position in the Upanishads and Vedas, its credibility ultimately becomes a matter of human contention among different Indian philosophical traditions and their revered scholars.
Furthermore, various religious traditions have claimed different levels of authority based on Sabda pramana and have considered themselves more authentic than others since ancient times. This leads to a clash of authenticity and creates doubt.
Therefore, it is necessary to study the skepticism and contradictions surrounding Sabda pramana before accepting it as a valid doctrine. This is an important question that should be contemplated during the study of Indian philosophy and epistemology.