In what way do girls develop gendered identity in families? Discuss with reference to the viewpoint of Leela Dube

Leela Dube, a distinguished Indian anthropologist and feminist scholar, extensively examines the process of gendered identity development in families.

Her insights shed light on how girls form their gender identities within familial frameworks, highlighting the intricate interplay of cultural norms, social structures, and individual agency. Dube’s perspective underscores the significance of comprehending how families operate as microcosms of broader societal gender dynamics.

Dube’s viewpoint emphasizes that the formation of gendered identity is neither uniform nor linear; rather, it involves a complex interplay of various elements. Families, as primary agents of socialization, play a central role in this process. From an early age, girls are exposed to a spectrum of experiences that mold their understanding of what it entails to be a girl within a specific cultural context. These experiences are mediated through interactions with family members, particularly parents, siblings, and extended kin.

Key to Dube’s analysis is the concept of “gender scripts” within families. These scripts encompass the roles, behaviors, and expectations linked to being a girl. Parents often inadvertently transmit these scripts through their actions and interactions. For instance, traditional divisions of labor at home can convey distinct gender roles; girls might observe their mothers involved in domestic chores, thus reinforcing the notion that these tasks are predominantly women’s responsibilities. These observations contribute to the internalization of gender norms and the gradual construction of a gendered identity.

Dube also underscores the role of rituals and ceremonies within families. These events serve as instances for reinforcing gender roles and identities. Traditional ceremonies linked to puberty or marriage, for instance, often underscore the shift from girlhood to womanhood, stressing the significance of adhering to prescribed gender norms. By partaking in these rituals, girls internalize the values and expectations of their society, further solidifying their gendered identities.

Nevertheless, Dube’s perspective does not posit determinism; it also acknowledges the agency of girls in negotiating and challenging gender norms. Families are not monolithic entities, and individual family members may interpret and engage with gender roles differently. Dube’s work highlights cases where girls resist or reinterpret conventional norms, often in subtle ways. These acts of resistance can range from pursuing education and careers to contesting restrictive dress codes.

Furthermore, Dube’s viewpoint underscores the impact of broader societal structures on family dynamics. Economic factors, for instance, can influence gendered identity formation. In families facing financial hardships, girls might be encouraged to assume non-traditional roles to contribute to the family income, potentially disrupting established gender scripts. Similarly, urbanization and exposure to diverse cultural influences can introduce alternate perspectives on gender, prompting girls to question existing norms.

In conclusion, Leela Dube’s perspective on the development of gendered identities in families highlights the multifaceted nature of this process. Families serve as pivotal sites of socialization, transmitting gender scripts and norms that mold girls’ perceptions of their roles and identities. Dube’s work emphasizes the influence of rituals, daily interactions, and broader societal structures on this process. Crucially, her viewpoint acknowledges the agency of girls in negotiating, challenging, and reinterpreting gender norms, thereby contributing to the evolution of gender roles in society. By delving into the intricacies of gender identity formation within families, Dube’s work lays the groundwork for a nuanced comprehension of how girls navigate and shape gendered identities in diverse cultural contexts.

Scroll to Top