Pro-social behavior refers to actions intended to benefit or help others, such as assisting someone in need, offering emotional support, or contributing to charitable causes.
Get the full solved assignment PDF of MPC-004 of 2024-25 session now by clicking on above button.
Several theoretical perspectives have been developed to explain why individuals engage in pro-social behavior. These theories explore different motivations, from self-interest to altruism, and how social, cognitive, and evolutionary factors influence helping behaviors.
1. Evolutionary Perspective
The evolutionary perspective on pro-social behavior is rooted in the idea that helping others can increase the likelihood of an individual’s genetic material being passed on to future generations. This theory, often associated with Darwinian evolution, suggests that pro-social behavior evolved because it helped individuals, or their kin, survive and reproduce.
Key Concepts:
- Kin Selection: Pro-social behavior may be directed more toward relatives than strangers because helping relatives (especially those who share a higher proportion of the same genes) increases the chances of those genes being passed on. The more genetically related an individual is to someone, the more likely they are to help them.
- Example: A person might be more likely to risk their life to save a sibling or child than to help an unrelated person because they share genetic material.
- Reciprocal Altruism: Pro-social behavior can also evolve through reciprocal altruism, where individuals help others with the expectation that the favor will be returned in the future. This is often summarized as the “you scratch my back, I’ll scratch yours” idea.
- Example: Helping a neighbor move or offering support may lead to that neighbor helping you when you need it.
- Group Selection: Pro-social behavior may enhance the survival of groups. Groups that are cooperative may fare better than those that are not, as cooperation can lead to better resources, protection, and survival.
Criticism:
While evolutionary theories are powerful in explaining pro-social behavior, they are criticized for being overly focused on genetic survival and not accounting for the complexities of human social behavior, such as altruistic acts for strangers.
2. Social Exchange Theory
The social exchange theory (or cost-benefit analysis) posits that pro-social behavior is driven by an exchange process, where individuals weigh the costs and benefits of helping others. According to this perspective, people help others when the rewards of helping (such as social approval, personal satisfaction, or future reciprocity) outweigh the costs (time, resources, or effort).
Key Concepts:
- Maximizing Rewards: According to this theory, people engage in helping behaviors because they anticipate positive outcomes. These outcomes might include social approval, enhanced reputation, or emotional satisfaction.
- Example: Donating money to a charity might make someone feel good about themselves and improve their social status or self-esteem.
- Minimizing Costs: In contrast, people may choose not to help if the costs (time, energy, or risk) outweigh the benefits.
- Example: A person may avoid helping a stranger on the street if it would put them in danger or require significant time and effort without any perceived reward.
Criticism:
Social exchange theory has been criticized for overemphasizing self-interest and underestimating genuinely altruistic motivations. It also does not explain why people sometimes help others at significant personal cost, without any clear return or reward.
3. Empathy-Altruism Hypothesis
The empathy-altruism hypothesis, proposed by C. Daniel Batson, argues that pro-social behavior is driven by empathy—the ability to understand and share the feelings of others. According to this hypothesis, when people feel empathy for someone in need, they are more likely to help them, even if there is no personal gain to be made.
Key Concepts:
- Empathy: The feeling of compassion or concern for another person’s suffering can drive individuals to engage in pro-social behavior, especially if the person is in distress.
- Example: If someone sees a person who has fallen and is visibly hurt, the observer may feel empathy and help the person, even if they don’t expect anything in return.
- Altruism: The hypothesis suggests that when empathy is evoked, helping behavior is motivated by a genuine desire to relieve the distress of others, with little regard for the costs or rewards.
- Example: Helping someone stranded on the road without the expectation of reward or recognition.
- Altruistic Motivation: Batson’s research suggests that when empathy is felt, the motivation to help is altruistic, meaning it is primarily about relieving the other person’s distress, not about achieving personal goals.
Criticism:
Some critics argue that the distinction between empathy-driven altruism and other forms of helping behavior is not always clear. It is also difficult to empirically separate pure altruism from other motivations, such as social norms or the desire to avoid negative emotions (e.g., guilt).
4. Social Norms Theory
According to social norms theory, pro-social behavior is driven by the influence of societal norms and cultural expectations. Individuals help others because they feel it is the “right” thing to do, based on norms and values internalized from society, culture, and socialization.
Key Concepts:
- Norm of Reciprocity: This social norm suggests that people feel obligated to help others who have helped them in the past or are likely to help them in the future.
- Example: If a friend helps you with a difficult task, you may feel obligated to return the favor when they need help.
- Norm of Social Responsibility: This norm suggests that people should help others in need, especially when they are unable to help themselves. This is often tied to moral values about justice and fairness.
- Example: Volunteering at a shelter or donating to a cause that helps the disadvantaged can be seen as fulfilling this social responsibility.
- Norm of Fairness and Equity: According to this norm, pro-social behavior is motivated by a desire to create fairness or equality in society. People may help others in ways that promote equal opportunities or address disparities.
- Example: People may support social movements or donate to organizations that promote equality or fight injustice.
Criticism:
Social norms theory does not always account for why individuals sometimes go against societal expectations or when norms conflict with personal interests. It also assumes that social norms are universally accepted, which may not be the case in all cultures or communities.
5. Cognitive Theories
Cognitive theories focus on the role of thought processes in determining pro-social behavior. These theories suggest that individuals engage in helping behaviors based on how they interpret situations, their beliefs, and their ability to understand the needs of others.
Key Concepts:
- Attribution Theory: This theory suggests that people engage in pro-social behavior based on their perceptions of others’ needs and circumstances. If people attribute a person’s suffering to external factors beyond their control (e.g., a natural disaster), they may be more likely to help.
- Example: People might be more likely to help a homeless person if they believe their situation is due to external factors (e.g., job loss) rather than personal failings (e.g., laziness).
- Moral Reasoning: Some cognitive theories suggest that individuals engage in pro-social behavior because they reason that helping others is the right thing to do. This involves internal moral guidelines or cognitive judgments that influence helping behavior.
- Example: An individual may help someone because their personal moral code dictates that helping others is an ethical duty.
Criticism:
Cognitive theories often focus on individual mental processes and may not fully account for the social or emotional factors that influence pro-social behavior, such as empathy or emotional contagion.
Conclusion:
Pro-social behavior is influenced by a complex interplay of evolutionary, social, emotional, and cognitive factors. Different theoretical perspectives offer valuable insights into why people help others, ranging from the survival of genes (evolutionary perspective) to social influences (social norms and exchange theories), emotional empathy (empathy-altruism hypothesis), and cognitive reasoning (attribution and moral theories). Understanding these perspectives helps to explain the variety of reasons why individuals engage in pro-social actions and the conditions under which such behaviors are more likely to occur.