Differences Between the Social Contract Theory and Marxian Theory of the Origin of the State
Get the full solved assignment PDF of MPS-004 of 2024-25 session now by clicking on above button.
The Social Contract Theory and the Marxian Theory present fundamentally different perspectives on the origin, nature, and purpose of the state. Below is a comparative analysis:
| Aspect | Social Contract Theory | Marxian Theory |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Proposes that the state originates from an agreement or contract among individuals to establish order and authority. | Argues that the state arises as a tool of class domination, created to protect the interests of the ruling class. |
| Key Proponents | Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, Jean-Jacques Rousseau. | Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels, Vladimir Lenin. |
| Purpose of the State | To provide security, enforce laws, and uphold the collective will of the people. | To serve as an instrument of oppression, maintaining the power of the bourgeoisie over the proletariat. |
| View of Human Nature | – Hobbes: Humans are selfish, requiring a strong state for order.- Locke: Humans are rational and capable of cooperation.- Rousseau: Humans are inherently good but corrupted by society. | Humans are shaped by their material conditions and class relations, not by inherent nature. |
| Basis of State Formation | Based on voluntary agreement among individuals to escape the state of nature and establish governance. | Emerges historically with the development of private property, economic inequality, and class divisions. |
| Role of Private Property | Views private property as a natural right that the state protects. | Views private property as the root cause of inequality and the state as a mechanism to protect it. |
| Class Perspective | Class distinctions are not central; the state represents the collective will. | The state is inherently a class institution, serving the ruling class at the expense of the oppressed classes. |
| View of State Power | Power is derived from the consent of the governed, with mechanisms for accountability (in Locke and Rousseau’s views). | Power is coercive and imposed by the ruling class to perpetuate exploitation and suppress revolutionary movements. |
| Evolution of the State | The state is a timeless institution arising from human rationality and social needs. | The state is a historical construct tied to specific stages of economic development (e.g., feudalism, capitalism). |
| End of the State | The state is a permanent feature of human society to maintain order and governance. | The state will “wither away” in a communist society, where class distinctions are abolished. |
Key Arguments
Social Contract Theory:
- Hobbes (Leviathan):
- In the “state of nature,” life is “solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.”
- People agree to surrender some freedoms to a sovereign authority for the sake of security and order.
- Locke (Two Treatises of Government):
- Humans are rational and possess natural rights (life, liberty, property).
- The state arises to protect these rights, and its legitimacy depends on the consent of the governed.
- Rousseau (The Social Contract):
- The state reflects the “general will” of the people.
- Sovereignty resides with the people, and the state must ensure equality and freedom.
Marxian Theory:
- Historical Materialism:
- Marx and Engels argued that the state is not a neutral institution but a product of historical material conditions.
- It emerged to manage conflicts arising from economic inequalities.
- State as an Instrument of Class Oppression:
- The state is controlled by the ruling class (e.g., feudal lords, capitalists) to protect their economic interests.
- Laws, institutions, and coercive apparatuses (police, military) reinforce class exploitation.
- Revolution and the State:
- The proletariat must overthrow the capitalist state through revolution.
- In the socialist stage, a “dictatorship of the proletariat” will dismantle class structures, leading to the eventual abolition of the state in a classless society.
Conclusion
The Social Contract Theory emphasizes a rational, consensual origin of the state to fulfill collective needs, focusing on individual rights and governance. In contrast, the Marxian Theory views the state as a product of economic exploitation and class conflict, destined to dissolve in a classless society. Both theories offer contrasting insights into the nature and purpose of the state, reflecting their underlying philosophical and ideological foundations.