“The landscape of Canada evokes terror in the literary mindscape “. Do you agree? Give a reasoned answer
Get the full solved assignment PDF of MEG-12 of 2024-25 session now by clicking on above button.
The claim that “the landscape of Canada evokes terror in the literary mindscape” is a perspective that finds resonance in certain aspects of Canadian literature. This view emerges from the way the vastness, isolation, and raw natural beauty of the Canadian wilderness have often been portrayed as both awe-inspiring and terrifying. However, it is essential to recognize that while terror is a recurring theme, the Canadian landscape evokes a wide range of emotional and intellectual responses, depending on the author and context. Below is a reasoned exploration of both sides of this idea.
1. The Sublime and Terror of the Wilderness
The Canadian wilderness, with its sprawling forests, harsh winters, and untamed natural forces, is often seen as a space of the sublime, where beauty and terror coexist. The sublime, in literary terms, refers to an experience where the power and vastness of nature are overwhelming, evoking both awe and fear. This duality is central to the works of many Canadian authors who explore the landscape as a force that dwarfs human endeavors and provokes existential reflection.
In Surfacing by Margaret Atwood, for example, the protagonist’s journey into the wilderness is a confrontation with her psychological fears and societal alienation. The untamed landscape becomes a mirror for her internal turmoil, creating a sense of isolation and helplessness that verges on terror. Similarly, in The Mountain and the Valley by Ernest Buckler, the wilderness is portrayed as a place of isolation, where human characters struggle with the overwhelming force of nature.
This sense of terror often stems from the sheer scale and power of the natural environment, where humans are not the masters but are instead vulnerable to the whims of the wilderness. The harshness of Canadian winters, the vast uninhabited forests, and the remoteness of rural areas have often been portrayed as threatening to human survival and sanity. In these depictions, the landscape becomes an antagonist, evoking terror as characters grapple with their insignificance in the face of nature’s immensity.
2. Colonialism and the Fear of the Unknown
For early settlers and colonizers, the Canadian landscape represented an unknown and untamed frontier, which often evoked fear and anxiety. European settlers, unfamiliar with the harsh conditions and sprawling wilderness, saw the land as an alien and hostile force. This sense of terror is captured in the early colonial literature, where the wilderness was often portrayed as a dangerous place that needed to be conquered or tamed.
Susanna Moodie’s Roughing It in the Bush (1852) reflects this colonial fear of the unknown. In her narrative, the Canadian landscape is often depicted as an inhospitable place filled with trials that threaten the settlers’ lives and sanity. The terror in such works is not merely about the physical dangers but also the psychological disorientation that comes from being in a strange, uncivilized land far from home.
This portrayal of the landscape as something to be feared is deeply rooted in the colonial mindset, where the wilderness represented a threat to European notions of order, control, and civilization. The vastness and wildness of Canada’s geography became symbolic of the unknown, sparking feelings of terror and alienation.
3. Contemporary Shifts: From Terror to Reverence
However, it is essential to acknowledge that the Canadian literary mindscape does not always evoke terror in response to the landscape. As the country matured, and especially in contemporary works, the relationship between Canadians and their environment has shifted. Many authors now portray the landscape not as a source of fear but as a space of reverence, connection, and even healing.
For instance, Indigenous authors such as Richard Wagamese and Tomson Highway write about the landscape as a source of spiritual connection and identity, rather than something to be feared. For Indigenous cultures, the land is sacred and holds cultural significance, standing in stark contrast to the colonial narratives of terror and conquest. Wagamese’s Indian Horse celebrates the land as a place of solace and rejuvenation, challenging the earlier representations of the Canadian wilderness as something to be feared.
Moreover, the Canadian wilderness has also been framed in environmental literature as a place that requires protection rather than domination. The rise of eco-literature, as seen in works by Farley Mowat (Never Cry Wolf) and Hugh MacLennan, reflects a growing appreciation for the environment, where the landscape evokes wonder and respect rather than terror.
4. The Multifarious Responses to the Landscape
The Canadian landscape can evoke terror, but it is not the only or dominant emotional response in literature. There is a range of reactions, including awe, reverence, connection, and contemplation. As Canada evolved, so too did its literary responses to the land, moving beyond colonial fears to encompass a more nuanced and diverse set of relationships with nature.
In conclusion, while the Canadian landscape certainly evokes terror in some literary works, particularly those rooted in the colonial experience or in narratives of survival, it also inspires awe, respect, and spiritual connection. The portrayal of the landscape in Canadian literature is multifaceted, reflecting the country’s diverse cultural and historical contexts. Therefore, it would be an oversimplification to suggest that terror is the only or even the dominant response to the Canadian landscape in the literary mindscape. Instead, it is one of many emotions elicited by the vast and powerful wilderness that defines much of the Canadian experience.