Discuss the interpretative and the feminist approach in writing ethnographies with suitable examples

Interpretative Approach in Ethnography

Get the full solved assignment PDF of MANE-003 of 2024-25 session now by clicking on above button.

The interpretative approach in ethnography emphasizes understanding culture through the meanings and symbols that people attach to their everyday lives. This approach is largely influenced by the interpretive theory in anthropology, particularly the work of Clifford Geertz, who argued that ethnography should be seen as a “thick description” of human behavior.

Key Features of the Interpretative Approach:

1. Understanding Meaning and Symbols: This approach stresses that ethnographers should not just observe actions, but also interpret the symbolic meanings behind these actions. It aims to uncover the deeper cultural meanings that people assign to their behaviors, beliefs, rituals, and interactions.
2. Contextualization: Ethnographers adopting this approach aim to situate the cultural practices they observe within the social, historical, and political context of the community. This allows for a deeper understanding of why certain practices or beliefs exist.
3. Emphasis on Subjectivity: The interpretative approach embraces the ethnographer’s subjectivity as an integral part of the research. Instead of striving for an “objective” or “neutral” perspective, ethnographers acknowledge their own role in shaping the research process.
4. Holistic Understanding: Interpretative ethnographers focus on understanding the entirety of a community’s life and worldview, rather than reducing cultural practices to isolated actions or behaviors.

Example of the Interpretative Approach:

• Clifford Geertz’s Study of Balinese Cockfighting: In his famous work, The Interpretation of Cultures (1973), Geertz explores the cultural significance of cockfighting in Bali, Indonesia. He doesn’t just describe the event but analyzes it as a metaphor for social status, masculinity, and local politics. Geertz interprets the cockfight as a “text” to be read, focusing on the meanings and symbols that local people attach to the event. His work emphasizes the symbolic meaning behind the cockfights rather than seeing it as merely a form of entertainment.

Feminist Approach in Ethnography

The feminist approach to ethnography emerged as a critique of traditional anthropological practices, which often ignored gender as a significant factor in understanding culture. Feminist ethnographers focus on how gender, power, and social inequalities shape cultural practices and relationships.

Key Features of the Feminist Approach:

1. Gender and Power Relations: Feminist ethnography critically examines how gender roles and power dynamics influence social structures and cultural practices. It seeks to understand how gendered experiences affect people’s lives in the community.
2. Challenging Objectivity: Feminist ethnographers challenge the traditional claim of ethnographic objectivity. They argue that ethnography is not a neutral or detached process and that the researcher’s position—particularly their gender—can influence the research. Feminist ethnographers often engage with their subjects and recognize their role in shaping the research process.
3. Voice and Representation: Feminist ethnographers emphasize the importance of giving voice to marginalized groups, particularly women. They aim to correct the historical silencing of women’s experiences in traditional ethnographies by prioritizing their perspectives.
4. Reflexivity: Feminist ethnographers stress the importance of reflexivity, meaning that researchers should critically examine their own biases, assumptions, and positionality in the research process. This includes reflecting on how gender, race, class, and other factors shape their interactions with participants and the interpretation of data.
5. Intersectionality: This approach also incorporates the idea of intersectionality, recognizing that gender is not the only factor influencing people’s lives. Class, race, sexuality, and other forms of identity interact to shape individuals’ experiences.

Examples of Feminist Ethnography:

• Sherry Ortner’s Study of Women and Men in Nepal: In her influential work, Nepalese Village (1978), Ortner explores the relationship between gender roles and power structures in a village in Nepal. She challenges the traditional assumption that women are universally oppressed in all societies and instead examines the complex relationship between gender, power, and culture in the specific context of Nepalese society.
• Lila Abu-Lughod’s “Veiled Sentiments”: In this work, Abu-Lughod provides a feminist ethnographic account of Bedouin women in Egypt. She critiques the tendency to depict women in non-Western societies as oppressed and silent. Instead, she examines how women express resistance and agency through poetry and other cultural practices. Abu-Lughod’s work is a classic example of using feminist ethnography to give voice to women in a patriarchal society.
• Michelle Rosaldo’s Work on Gender in the Philippines: In her ethnographic study of the Ilongot people of the Philippines, Michelle Rosaldo discusses how the gendered division of labor and cultural practices shape the roles of men and women in the society. She also reflects on the impact of colonialism and Western influence on gender relations in indigenous societies.

Comparing the Interpretative and Feminist Approaches

• Focus: The interpretative approach is more focused on understanding the meanings and symbols in culture, while the feminist approach centers on issues of gender, power, and inequality.
• The Role of the Researcher: Both approaches acknowledge the ethnographer’s subjectivity, but feminist ethnography places a more explicit emphasis on the researcher’s positionality, particularly in terms of gender, power, and social privilege.
• Research Priorities: The interpretative approach prioritizes the holistic understanding of a culture through its symbols and meanings, while feminist ethnography prioritizes understanding how gendered power dynamics shape people’s lives and experiences.
• Methodology: The interpretative approach tends to use deep, symbolic analysis of cultural practices, while feminist ethnography often employs more reflexive and participatory methods, with an emphasis on giving voice to marginalized groups, especially women.

Conclusion

Both the interpretative and feminist approaches have significantly influenced the field of ethnography. The interpretative approach, led by scholars like Geertz, opened up new ways of analyzing culture through symbols and meanings. Meanwhile, the feminist approach challenged the dominant narratives in anthropology and provided a critical framework for understanding how gender and power shape cultures and societies. Together, these approaches have enriched ethnographic practice, making it more nuanced, reflexive, and inclusive.