Constitutional Amendments Influencing Union-State Relations in India
Get the full solved assignment PDF of MPSE-008 of 2024-25 session now by clicking on above button.
India’s federal structure, as outlined in the Constitution, provides for a division of powers between the Union and the States. Over time, several constitutional amendments have reshaped Union-State relations, reflecting the dynamic nature of India’s polity. These amendments have aimed to address political, administrative, financial, and jurisdictional concerns.
Key Constitutional Amendments and Their Influence
1. The Seventh Amendment (1956): Reorganization of States
- Context: Enacted based on the recommendations of the States Reorganization Commission (1955) to reorganize states along linguistic lines.
- Impact on Union-State Relations:
- Enhanced administrative efficiency by redrawing state boundaries.
- Reaffirmed the Union’s authority to reorganize states under Article 3.
- Highlighted the central role of the Union in determining the structure of federal units.
2. The Forty-Second Amendment (1976): Centralization of Power
- Context: Introduced during the Emergency (1975–77) to strengthen the central government.
- Key Provisions:
- Transferred subjects like Education, Forests, Weights and Measures, and Protection of Wild Animals and Birds from the State List to the Concurrent List.
- Restricted judicial review of central laws.
- Made the President bound by the advice of the Council of Ministers.
- Impact:
- Increased the Union’s control over matters traditionally within the States’ domain.
- Criticized for undermining federalism by concentrating power in the Union.
3. The Forty-Fourth Amendment (1978): Restoration of Federal Balance
- Context: Enacted after the Emergency to undo some provisions of the Forty-Second Amendment.
- Key Provisions:
- Restored judicial review by limiting Parliament’s power to amend the Constitution.
- Made the declaration of National Emergency under Article 352 more stringent by requiring a written recommendation from the Cabinet.
- Impact:
- Strengthened the federal structure by safeguarding state autonomy in the context of emergency provisions.
4. The Fifty-Sixth Amendment (1987): Statehood for Arunachal Pradesh
- Context: Granted full statehood to Arunachal Pradesh.
- Impact:
- Demonstrated the Union’s willingness to enhance federal units’ autonomy when required.
- Addressed regional demands while maintaining the Union’s control over state formation.
5. The Sixty-First Amendment (1989): Voting Age Reduction
- Context: Reduced the voting age from 21 to 18 years under Article 326.
- Impact:
- Strengthened democracy by expanding the electorate, indirectly influencing state and Union political dynamics.
6. The Seventy-Third and Seventy-Fourth Amendments (1992): Strengthening Local Governance
- Context: Aimed to institutionalize Panchayati Raj and Urban Local Bodies.
- Key Provisions:
- Mandated the establishment of three-tier local governance systems.
- Provided direct funding to local bodies, bypassing states to some extent.
- Impact:
- Decentralized governance and enhanced local participation.
- Shifted some responsibilities from state governments to local bodies, altering the Union-State dynamic.
7. The Eighty-Third Amendment (2000): Prohibition of Reservation in Panchayats in Arunachal Pradesh
- Context: Exempted Arunachal Pradesh from reserving seats for Scheduled Castes in Panchayats due to its negligible SC population.
- Impact:
- Highlighted the adaptability of the federal structure to accommodate regional peculiarities.
8. The Eighty-Eighth Amendment (2003): Introduction of GST
- Context: Provided for the levy of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) on services under Article 268A.
- Impact:
- Facilitated the eventual implementation of GST, significantly altering fiscal federalism by centralizing indirect taxation.
9. The Ninety-First Amendment (2003): Limiting the Size of Cabinets
- Context: Aimed at curbing political instability caused by the proliferation of ministerial posts.
- Key Provisions:
- Capped the size of cabinets at 15% of the legislative assembly’s strength.
- Impact:
- Reduced the misuse of ministerial appointments as political rewards, indirectly influencing state-level governance.
10. The One Hundred and First Amendment (2016): Implementation of GST
- Context: Established the Goods and Services Tax, a significant reform in India’s tax structure.
- Key Provisions:
- Abolished multiple indirect taxes like VAT and service tax.
- Created the GST Council, a federal body involving both the Union and the States.
- Impact:
- Shifted a portion of states’ fiscal autonomy to the Union.
- Introduced a cooperative federalism model through the GST Council, where Union and States jointly decide tax rates and policies.
Critical Analysis
Strengths of the Amendments
- Adaptability of Federalism: The amendments reflect India’s ability to adapt its federal structure to changing needs and circumstances.
- Balance Between Centralization and Decentralization: While some amendments enhanced central control, others, like the 73rd and 74th, empowered local governance.
- Cooperative Mechanisms: The GST Council and similar provisions emphasize collaboration between the Union and States.
Challenges Posed
- Erosion of State Autonomy: Amendments like the Forty-Second and One Hundred and First have concentrated powers with the Union.
- Fiscal Strains: Central schemes and tax reforms often leave states with limited fiscal autonomy.
- Imbalance in Federal Relations: Some states perceive a bias in resource allocation and legislative priorities, leading to regional discontent.
Conclusion
Constitutional amendments have significantly shaped Union-State relations in India, balancing the needs for a strong center and robust state autonomy. While they have enhanced India’s federal structure’s resilience, challenges like fiscal imbalances and regional discontent remain. Strengthening cooperative federalism and addressing state-specific concerns are crucial for maintaining the delicate balance of Union-State relations.