Discuss the rule of quantification in detail. How would you apply these quantification rules? Illustrate with examples

Q: Discuss the rule of quantification in detail. How would you apply these quantification rules? Illustrate with examples

Get the full solved assignment PDF of MPYE-001 of 2024-25 session now by clicking on above button.

The Rule of Quantification in Logic

Quantification is a key concept in formal logic that involves expressing statements about collections or quantities of objects. It allows us to make general assertions about all members of a particular set or some members of that set. The two primary types of quantifiers used in logical expressions are:

1. Universal Quantifier: Denoted as ∀ (for all), it asserts that a property holds for all elements in a given domain.
2. Existential Quantifier: Denoted as ∃ (there exists), it asserts that there is at least one element in the domain for which a property holds.

1. Universal Quantifier (∀)

The universal quantifier is used to express that a certain property or relation applies to all members of a specific set. Its general form is:

[ \forall x \, P(x) ]

This reads as “for all (x), (P(x)) is true,” where (P(x)) is a predicate that defines a property of (x).

Example:

Consider the statement:

• “All humans are mortal.”

In logical notation, we can express this as:
[ \forall x \, (H(x) \implies M(x)) ]
Where:

• (H(x)) = “x is a human”
• (M(x)) = “x is mortal”

This statement asserts that for every individual (x), if (x) is a human, then (x) is mortal.

2. Existential Quantifier (∃)

The existential quantifier is used to express that there is at least one member in a set that satisfies a particular property. Its general form is:

[ \exists x \, P(x) ]

This reads as “there exists an (x) such that (P(x)) is true.”

Example:

Consider the statement:

• “There exists a human who is a philosopher.”

In logical notation, we can express this as:
[ \exists x \, (H(x) \land P(x)) ]
Where:

• (H(x)) = “x is a human”
• (P(x)) = “x is a philosopher”

This statement asserts that there is at least one individual (x) such that (x) is a human and (x) is a philosopher.

3. Combining Quantifiers

Quantifiers can be combined to express more complex statements. The order of quantifiers is crucial and can change the meaning of the statement.

Example:

Consider the statement:

• “For every human, there exists a philosopher.”

In logical notation, this can be expressed as:
[ \forall x \, (H(x) \implies \exists y \, (H(y) \land P(y))) ]

This asserts that for every human (x), there is at least one philosopher (y).

However, if we reverse the order of the quantifiers:

• “There exists a philosopher for every human.”

This would be expressed as:
[ \exists y \, (P(y) \land \forall x \, (H(x) \implies H(y))) ]

This asserts that there is a single philosopher who is also a human for every human, which is a significantly different statement.

4. Rules of Quantification

When working with quantifiers, there are several rules that help manipulate logical statements:

a. Universal Instantiation (UI)

• From a universal statement, you can conclude a specific instance.
• If (\forall x \, P(x)) is true, then (P(a)) is true for any specific (a).

b. Universal Generalization (UG)

• If you have shown that a property holds for an arbitrary individual, you can conclude it holds for all.
• If (P(a)) is true for an arbitrary (a), then (\forall x \, P(x)) is true.

c. Existential Instantiation (EI)

• From an existential statement, you can conclude a specific instance, introducing a new constant.
• If (\exists x \, P(x)) is true, then (P(c)) is true for some new constant (c).

d. Existential Generalization (EG)

• If you know a specific instance holds true, you can conclude an existential statement.
• If (P(a)) is true for a specific (a), then (\exists x \, P(x)) is true.

5. Applying Quantification Rules: Examples

Example 1: Universal Quantifier

Statement: “All birds can fly.”

• Logical Form:
  [ \forall x \, (B(x) \implies F(x)) ]
  Where:
• (B(x)) = “x is a bird”
• (F(x)) = “x can fly”

Application: If we know (B(Tweety)) is true (Tweety is a bird), we can apply Universal Instantiation:

• (B(Tweety) \implies F(Tweety))
• Thus, (F(Tweety)) is true (Tweety can fly).

Example 2: Existential Quantifier

Statement: “There exists a student who passed the exam.”

• Logical Form:
  [ \exists x \, (S(x) \land P(x)) ]
  Where:
• (S(x)) = “x is a student”
• (P(x)) = “x passed the exam”

Application: If we know that (S(John)) is true and (P(John)) is also true:

• (S(John) \land P(John)) is true.
• We can apply Existential Generalization to conclude:
  [ \exists x \, (S(x) \land P(x)) ]
• Therefore, “There exists a student who passed the exam.”

Conclusion

Quantification is a powerful tool in formal logic, enabling the expression of statements about entire classes of objects. By understanding the rules of quantification and how to apply them, we can derive meaningful conclusions from logical premises. This forms the basis for rigorous reasoning in mathematics, computer science, and philosophy, allowing us to articulate complex ideas with clarity and precision.