Explain the Resource Mobilization Theory and the Relative Deprivation Theory in the context of social movements

Social movements are collective efforts by individuals or groups aiming to bring about social, political, or cultural change.

Get the full solved assignment PDF of MPSE-007 of 2024-25 session now by clicking on above button.

Various theories attempt to explain why social movements emerge, how they mobilize resources, and how they influence society. Two influential theories that offer insights into the dynamics of social movements are the Resource Mobilization Theory and the Relative Deprivation Theory. These theories focus on the factors that drive collective action, but they approach the issue from different perspectives: one emphasizes the availability and mobilization of resources, while the other focuses on the perceived inequalities between groups.

1. Resource Mobilization Theory:

Resource Mobilization Theory (RMT) emphasizes the importance of resources—such as money, organizational structures, leadership, and networks—in the formation and success of social movements. This theory argues that the existence of grievances alone is not enough to explain the emergence of social movements; rather, the ability of a group to mobilize resources effectively is crucial for the movement’s success.

Key Concepts of Resource Mobilization Theory:

  1. Resources:
    • RMT focuses on the material, human, and organizational resources that are essential for a movement’s survival and success. These resources include funds, leaders, information, media access, volunteers, and organizational infrastructure (e.g., offices, networks, and activists).
  2. Organizational Structure:
    • Successful social movements require a well-organized structure. This includes leadership, strategic planning, membership, and an established chain of command to manage activities. Movements with strong organizational capabilities are more likely to mobilize supporters, form alliances, and gain political influence.
  3. Strategic Action:
    • According to RMT, social movements are not spontaneous but instead involve calculated efforts to achieve goals. Movements use strategic tactics, such as protests, lobbying, media campaigns, or legal actions, to garner attention, raise awareness, and demand change.
  4. Political Opportunities:
    • The theory also suggests that social movements are more likely to emerge and succeed when there are favorable political opportunities, such as a political opening (e.g., regime change, policy shifts) or a sympathetic political climate.
  5. Framing and Collective Identity:
    • Movements must frame their issues in a way that resonates with potential supporters. This involves creating a collective identity and framing the movement’s goals and grievances in a manner that is compelling and understandable to the public and stakeholders.

Key Exponents of RMT:

  • McCarthy and Zald (1977) are among the key scholars associated with the development of RMT. They argued that movements are rational and strategic, and they rely on organized efforts to acquire and allocate resources efficiently to further their goals.

Criticism of Resource Mobilization Theory:

  • Critics argue that RMT overlooks the role of emotions and moral motivations in social movements. While the theory focuses on tangible resources, it underestimates the importance of ideological commitment, moral outrage, and emotional investments that often motivate people to join movements.
  • RMT has also been criticized for its overemphasis on the organizational aspects of movements, neglecting grassroots mobilization and the role of informal networks in initiating collective action.

2. Relative Deprivation Theory:

Relative Deprivation Theory focuses on the psychological and social aspects of social movements. It argues that social movements arise when individuals or groups feel deprived of resources, opportunities, or status relative to others, even if their actual conditions have not worsened. This perceived deprivation motivates people to join movements in the hope of achieving social justice, equality, or political change.

Key Concepts of Relative Deprivation Theory:

  1. Deprivation and Discontent:
    • The central idea is that relative deprivation occurs when people compare themselves to others and feel they are unfairly deprived of resources or opportunities. This sense of inequality or injustice leads to feelings of frustration, anger, and resentment.
    • People may not necessarily be worse off than before, but they feel aggrieved because they perceive that others have more opportunities, wealth, or power than they do.
  2. Perception of Unfairness:
    • A key aspect of relative deprivation is the perception of injustice. People may feel that they are being denied what they believe is rightfully theirs or that others are receiving benefits they do not deserve. This perception can foster feelings of resentment and a desire for social change.
  3. Collective Action:
    • According to the theory, the feeling of deprivation leads to the desire to challenge the status quo. People who experience relative deprivation may organize themselves into movements to demand social, economic, or political rights. These movements seek to address perceived inequities and disadvantages that are felt to be unfair.
  4. Social Comparison:
    • Relative deprivation is often understood in terms of social comparison. Individuals or groups compare their situation to others, and when they perceive that they are disadvantaged relative to a reference group, they are more likely to mobilize for change.
  5. Aspirations and Expectations:
    • This theory also emphasizes the gap between aspirations (what individuals or groups believe they deserve) and expectations (what they feel they can realistically achieve). When this gap widens, relative deprivation intensifies, spurring collective action.

Key Exponents of Relative Deprivation Theory:

  • Gurr (1970) is a major proponent of relative deprivation theory. In his work “Why Men Rebel,” he argued that feelings of deprivation and frustration caused by inequality are primary factors driving political and social unrest.

Criticism of Relative Deprivation Theory:

  • One critique of relative deprivation theory is that it does not adequately explain why people with similar grievances do not always mobilize. Not all groups that experience deprivation or inequality engage in social movements.
  • The theory tends to focus on the psychological state of individuals without considering structural factors, such as economic or political conditions, that may contribute to the emergence of social movements.
  • Critics also argue that relative deprivation may not always lead to collective action, as individuals may feel powerless to change their circumstances or may not have the necessary resources to organize effectively.

Comparing the Two Theories:

  1. Focus of the Theories:
    • Resource Mobilization Theory emphasizes the availability and strategic use of resources (organizational, financial, human) in the creation and success of social movements.
    • Relative Deprivation Theory emphasizes the perceived inequality or injustice that fuels collective action, focusing on the psychological motivations of individuals or groups.
  2. Emphasis on Structural vs. Psychological Factors:
    • RMT focuses on the external factors like resources, organization, and political opportunities that make a movement viable.
    • Relative Deprivation focuses more on the internal factors such as perceptions of deprivation and injustice, as well as the social and psychological conditions that lead to the formation of a movement.
  3. Movement Emergence:
    • According to RMT, movements emerge when there is sufficient organization and resources to mobilize, and when there are political opportunities to exploit.
    • According to Relative Deprivation Theory, movements arise when individuals or groups feel discontented or deprived compared to others, even if they are not objectively worse off.
  4. Role of Emotions:
    • RMT generally sees movements as rational and focused on obtaining resources, with a more strategic approach to collective action.
    • Relative Deprivation Theory emphasizes the emotional and psychological aspects of movements, such as frustration, anger, and resentment due to perceived inequality.

Conclusion:

Both Resource Mobilization Theory and Relative Deprivation Theory offer important insights into the dynamics of social movements. While RMT underscores the importance of resources, organization, and strategic action in the success of movements, Relative Deprivation Theory highlights the psychological triggers of collective action, such as the perception of injustice and inequality. These theories are not mutually exclusive but rather complement each other, offering a fuller understanding of why social movements emerge, how they mobilize, and the factors that influence their success.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top