Distinguish between positive and normative economics. Which one should be preferred and why

Positive economics and normative economics are two branches of economics that serve different purposes and involve different types of analysis.

  1. Positive Economics:
  • Definition: Positive economics is concerned with describing and explaining economic phenomena as they are, without making value judgments or expressing opinions about whether they are good or bad.
  • Objective: The primary goal of positive economics is to provide an objective analysis based on facts and empirical evidence. It focuses on what is, and its conclusions can be tested and verified.
  • Example: “An increase in the minimum wage will lead to a decrease in the employment of low-skilled workers” is a positive economic statement. It can be tested and either confirmed or refuted based on observable data.
  1. Normative Economics:
  • Definition: Normative economics deals with value judgments and subjective opinions about what ought to be or what is desirable. It involves making recommendations or expressing opinions about economic policies.
  • Objective: Normative economics is inherently subjective and involves the introduction of personal or societal values. It is concerned with issues of ethics and fairness in economic policies.
  • Example: “The government should increase spending on education to promote social equity” is a normative economic statement. It reflects a value judgment about the desirability of a particular policy.

Which One Should be Preferred and Why:

Both positive and normative economics play important roles in understanding and shaping economic discussions. Neither is inherently superior to the other, as they serve different purposes:

  • Positive Economics:
  • Advantages: Provides a basis for objective analysis, allows for empirical testing and verification, helps in understanding how economic systems function.
  • Limitations: Cannot provide guidance on what policies should be pursued since it does not involve value judgments.
  • Normative Economics:
  • Advantages: Addresses the question of what ought to be, helps in forming opinions about desirable economic policies, considers ethical and moral aspects.
  • Limitations: Subjective nature may lead to disagreements among individuals or groups with different values.

In practice, a combination of positive and normative analysis is often used to form well-informed economic decisions. Positive economics provides the factual foundation, while normative economics allows for the incorporation of values and ethical considerations into policy recommendations. A comprehensive understanding of economic issues often requires both perspectives. However, it’s crucial to be transparent about the distinction between positive and normative statements to ensure clarity in economic discussions.

Scroll to Top