Q: Do you agree that Gandhian approach towards the concept of Purushartha is different from its traditional approach? Give reasons to support your answers
Get the full solved assignment PDF of MPYE-015 of 2024-25 session now by clicking on above button.
Yes, the Gandhian approach to the concept of Purushartha significantly differs from traditional interpretations, primarily due to Gandhi’s emphasis on ethical and spiritual dimensions over materialistic pursuits. Purushartha refers to the four objectives of human life in Hindu philosophy: Dharma (righteousness), Artha (prosperity), Kama (pleasure), and Moksha (liberation). Gandhi’s perspective reinterprets these aims, reflecting his unique philosophy and ethical values. Here are some reasons to support this view:
1. Emphasis on Dharma
In traditional interpretations, Dharma is often understood as adhering to societal norms, laws, and duties. However, Gandhi redefined Dharma to emphasize truth and non-violence (ahimsa) as the highest ethical principles. For Gandhi, Dharma transcends mere conformity to social norms and is rooted in the pursuit of moral integrity and spiritual awakening. He believed that true Dharma involves a commitment to justice, equality, and service to others, aligning individual actions with the greater good.
2. Reevaluation of Artha and Kama
While traditional thought often regards Artha (material wealth) and Kama (sensory pleasures) as essential pursuits in life, Gandhi criticized excessive attachment to these goals. He advocated for a more restrained and ethical approach to wealth, arguing that the pursuit of Artha should be balanced with a sense of social responsibility. In his view, the accumulation of wealth should not lead to exploitation or inequality. Similarly, Gandhi believed that Kama should be pursued with mindfulness and respect for others, emphasizing the need for moderation and moral conduct in the pursuit of pleasure.
3. Integration of Moksha with Social Responsibility
Traditionally, Moksha is viewed as the ultimate goal of human life, representing liberation from the cycle of birth and death. Gandhi, however, integrated this spiritual goal with social responsibility. He believed that one cannot attain true liberation without engaging in the struggle for justice and the welfare of society. Gandhi’s concept of Moksha was thus not solely individualistic; it involved collective liberation through ethical living, community service, and active resistance to injustice.
4. Holistic Approach to Life
Gandhi’s understanding of Purushartha is holistic, viewing the four objectives as interconnected rather than separate pursuits. He believed that true fulfillment arises from balancing Dharma, Artha, Kama, and Moksha in a way that promotes personal and societal well-being. This contrasts with traditional perspectives that may treat these pursuits as distinct and occasionally conflicting objectives. Gandhi’s vision encourages individuals to align their material pursuits with their ethical and spiritual values.
5. Critique of Materialism
Gandhi was critical of modern materialism and the obsession with wealth that often characterizes contemporary society. He argued that the relentless pursuit of material wealth leads to moral decay and social injustice. His approach to Purushartha advocates for a lifestyle based on simplicity, self-sufficiency, and a focus on inner growth rather than external possessions. This perspective stands in stark contrast to traditional views that might prioritize economic success as a primary goal.
Conclusion
In conclusion, Gandhi’s approach to the concept of Purushartha is distinct from traditional interpretations due to his emphasis on ethical living, social responsibility, and the interconnectedness of the four objectives. By prioritizing Dharma in terms of truth and non-violence, reevaluating the roles of Artha and Kama, and integrating Moksha with a commitment to societal welfare, Gandhi redefines human purpose in a way that transcends materialistic pursuits. His vision remains relevant today, inspiring individuals to seek a balanced and meaningful life that honors both personal and collective aspirations.