Discuss the Faustmann model for maximisation of Present Value of net benefits

The Faustmann model, developed by German economist Martin Faustmann in 1849, is a dynamic optimization model used in forestry to determine the optimal rotation period for harvesting trees to maximize the present value of net benefits.

The model provides insights into the optimal timing of harvesting timber to balance the costs and benefits associated with forestry activities. Here are the key components and considerations of the Faustmann model:


  1. Single Rotation Period:
  • The Faustmann model assumes a single rotation period, during which trees are planted, grown, and harvested.
  1. Homogeneous Stand:
  • The forest stand is assumed to be homogeneous, with uniform growth rates and timber yields.
  1. Time Value of Money:
  • The model incorporates the time value of money, recognizing that future cash flows are discounted to their present value.
  1. Infinite Time Horizon:
  • The Faustmann model assumes an infinite time horizon, allowing for the consideration of long-term benefits and costs.

Components of the Model:

  1. Timber Growth:
  • The model considers the growth of timber over time, factoring in the biological growth of trees and the corresponding increase in timber volume.
  1. Harvesting Costs:
  • Harvesting costs, including expenses related to cutting, processing, and transporting timber, are taken into account.
  1. Land Value:
  • The value of land is included in the model. Land can have alternative uses, such as agriculture or real estate development, and its opportunity cost is factored into the decision-making process.
  1. Discount Rate:
  • The discount rate represents the opportunity cost of capital and reflects the time value of money. It is used to discount future cash flows to their present value.
  1. Net Present Value (NPV):
  • The objective is to maximize the net present value of benefits over costs. The net present value is the sum of the present values of all future cash inflows (timber revenues) and outflows (harvesting costs, land costs).

Mathematical Formulation:

The basic formula for the Faustmann model is as follows:

[NPV = \sum_{t=1}^{T} \left(\frac{R_t – C_t}{(1 + r)^t}\right) – L \times (1 + r)^{-T}]


  • (NPV) is the net present value.
  • (T) is the rotation period.
  • (R_t) is the revenue from timber at time (t).
  • (C_t) is the cost of harvesting at time (t).
  • (L) is the land value.
  • (r) is the discount rate.

Optimal Rotation Period:

The optimal rotation period, denoted as (T^*), is the rotation period that maximizes the net present value. It is determined by finding the value of (T) that maximizes the expression.

[T^* = \arg\max_T \left(\sum_{t=1}^{T} \left(\frac{R_t – C_t}{(1 + r)^t}\right) – L \times (1 + r)^{-T}\right)]


  1. Harvesting Decision:
  • The model provides insights into when to harvest the timber to maximize the present value of net benefits.
  1. Trade-off with Land Use:
  • The model helps in assessing the trade-off between continued forestry activities and alternative land uses.
  1. Sensitivity to Parameters:
  • The optimal rotation period is sensitive to parameters such as discount rate, timber growth rates, and harvesting costs.


  1. Simplified Assumptions:
  • The model relies on simplifying assumptions, and deviations from these assumptions in real-world scenarios may affect the accuracy of the results.
  1. Biological and Economic Uncertainties:
  • Biological uncertainties related to timber growth and economic uncertainties related to market conditions can pose challenges to the model’s applicability.
  1. Dynamic Factors:
  • The Faustmann model is a static model that does not explicitly consider dynamic factors such as technological advancements, changing market conditions, or environmental factors.

In conclusion, the Faustmann model is a foundational framework in forestry economics that guides decisions on the optimal rotation period for harvesting timber. It highlights the trade-offs between immediate benefits and long-term sustainability, considering the time value of money and opportunity costs associated with alternative land uses.

Scroll to Top