Q: What is Pratityasamutpada? How is it related to four Nobel truths? Compare interpretations of Pratityasamutpada given by any two schools of Buddhism
Get the full solved assignment PDF of MPY-001 of 2024-25 session now by clicking on above button.
Pratītyasamutpāda, often translated as “dependent origination” or “dependent co-arising,” is a central concept in Buddhism that explains the interconnected and interdependent nature of all phenomena. According to this doctrine, all things arise, exist, and cease in dependence upon various causes and conditions. It emphasizes that nothing exists independently or inherently; rather, all phenomena are contingent upon other phenomena. This doctrine serves as a foundational explanation of the Buddhist understanding of suffering, existence, and liberation.
Relation to the Four Noble Truths
Pratītyasamutpāda is intricately linked to the Four Noble Truths, which form the core of the Buddha’s teachings:
- The Truth of Suffering (Dukkha): All conditioned phenomena are marked by suffering or dissatisfaction. Pratītyasamutpāda explains suffering’s origin as part of a continuous chain of cause and effect. Understanding dependent origination reveals how suffering arises due to ignorance and attachment.
- The Truth of the Cause of Suffering (Samudaya): Suffering originates from specific causes, namely, ignorance (avidyā), which leads to craving (tṛṣṇā) and clinging. The 12 links of Pratītyasamutpāda illustrate how ignorance initiates a cycle of mental formations, consciousness, craving, and becoming, eventually leading to suffering.
- The Truth of the Cessation of Suffering (Nirodha): By recognizing the interconnected nature of suffering, one can dismantle the chain of Pratītyasamutpāda. When ignorance is uprooted, the cycle of dependent origination ceases, leading to liberation.
- The Truth of the Path Leading to the Cessation of Suffering (Magga): The Eightfold Path offers practical guidance for breaking the cycle of dependent origination. Mindfulness and wisdom are particularly emphasized in observing the patterns of causation and in freeing oneself from attachment and delusion.
In sum, Pratītyasamutpāda provides a framework for understanding the Four Noble Truths by revealing the mechanics of suffering’s arising, its cessation, and the path toward liberation.
Comparative Interpretations of Pratītyasamutpāda by Two Schools of Buddhism
1. Theravāda Interpretation
In the Theravāda tradition, Pratītyasamutpāda is viewed as a sequential, causal chain that describes the process of rebirth and suffering over multiple lifetimes. The doctrine is represented by the “12 links” or nidānas, which illustrate how ignorance leads to suffering and rebirth:
- Ignorance (avidyā)
- Mental formations (saṅkhāra)
- Consciousness (viññāṇa)
- Name and form (nāmarūpa)
- Six sense bases (ṣaḷāyatana)
- Contact (phassa)
- Feeling (vedanā)
- Craving (taṇhā)
- Clinging (upādāna)
- Becoming (bhava)
- Birth (jāti)
- Aging and death (jarāmaraṇa)
Theravāda places emphasis on literal causation, viewing each link as part of an ongoing cycle. By understanding and dismantling these links, especially ignorance and craving, one can transcend the cycle of birth and death and achieve nirvāṇa. In this interpretation, Pratītyasamutpāda is closely related to the Four Noble Truths by explaining the arising and cessation of suffering through dependent conditions.
2. Madhyamaka Interpretation (Mahayana School)
In contrast, the Madhyamaka school, founded by Nāgārjuna, interprets Pratītyasamutpāda with an emphasis on the emptiness (śūnyatā) of all phenomena. According to Madhyamaka, dependent origination shows that all phenomena are empty of intrinsic existence, as they rely entirely on conditions external to themselves. Nāgārjuna asserts that phenomena are neither truly existent nor nonexistent but exist in a state of “emptiness” where they are devoid of inherent nature.
This interpretation of Pratītyasamutpāda goes beyond mere causation and describes the interconnected, non-substantial nature of all things. Madhyamaka views the realization of śūnyatā as the key to liberation, as it dismantles attachment to self and the illusion of inherent existence, ultimately leading to nirvāṇa. Thus, the Madhyamaka interpretation connects Pratītyasamutpāda to the Four Noble Truths by positing that suffering arises from grasping at inherently nonexistent things and that liberation is attained through realizing the emptiness of all conditioned phenomena.
Conclusion
While both the Theravāda and Madhyamaka schools regard Pratītyasamutpāda as central to understanding suffering and liberation, they offer distinct interpretations. The Theravāda approach views dependent origination as a sequential, causal process that operates across lifetimes. In contrast, the Madhyamaka school interprets it through the lens of emptiness, emphasizing the non-substantial nature of all phenomena. Both perspectives demonstrate how Pratītyasamutpāda enriches the Four Noble Truths by elucidating the causes of suffering and the path to liberation.