St. Thomas Aquinas, a 13th-century Catholic philosopher and theologian, is renowned for his synthesis of Christian theology with Aristotelian philosophy.
Get the full solved assignment PDF of MPSE-003 of 2024-25 session now by clicking on above button.
One of his key contributions to political theory was his understanding of the relationship between the Church and the State, particularly in his work Summa Theologica and Summa Contra Gentiles. Aquinas proposed a harmonious relationship between the two institutions, each with its own distinct role, but both ultimately directed toward the common good.
Aquinas’ Key Views on Church and State:
1. The Natural Law and the Divine Law:
- Natural Law: Aquinas believed that human beings are governed by both natural law (which is rational and can be understood by human reason) and divine law (revealed through Scripture and the teachings of the Church). Natural law forms the foundation of human governance and directs human actions toward the common good, which is both spiritual and temporal.
- Divine Law: The Church, according to Aquinas, is the institution that helps guide individuals toward the ultimate goal of salvation, using divine law and Christian teachings. While the Church deals with the salvation of souls, the State is concerned with the material and political order.
2. The Distinct Roles of Church and State:
Aquinas asserted that the Church and the State have distinct, yet complementary, roles in society.
- The Church is concerned with the spiritual welfare of individuals, focusing on the salvation of souls, morality, and the ultimate end (the eternal life with God). Its power is spiritual, and its authority is derived from God, expressed through the Pope and the clergy.
- The State is concerned with the temporal, material well-being of individuals and society. Its purpose is to maintain peace, justice, and the common good in the temporal realm. Its authority is derived from God but is mediated through the consent of the governed and human reason.
3. Harmony Between Church and State:
Aquinas argued that the Church and State should work in harmony. Both institutions are seen as instruments of God’s will, serving different aspects of human existence:
- Cooperation: Aquinas envisioned a cooperative relationship, where the State enacts laws that promote the common good and support the moral order, while the Church guides individuals toward salvation and moral behavior. The State should respect the moral teachings of the Church, and the Church should support the moral authority of the State in maintaining order and justice.
- Distinct but Interconnected: While Aquinas acknowledged the distinct roles of each institution, he also believed that the Church and State should not be in conflict but should cooperate for the common good of society. The Church, however, should not meddle in the temporal affairs of the State, and the State should not encroach upon the spiritual authority of the Church.
4. The Role of the King and the Church:
- Secular Authority: The king (or ruler) is a servant of the people and a representative of divine order on earth. He is tasked with maintaining peace, justice, and the common good through the laws of the State. The king’s authority is derived from God but is subject to reason and the moral law.
- Spiritual Authority: The Pope and clergy have spiritual authority over individuals, guiding them in matters of faith and salvation. In Aquinas’ view, the Pope’s authority was supreme in spiritual matters, but in temporal matters, the king’s authority should prevail. However, the king’s actions must align with natural law and moral principles, which are influenced by the teachings of the Church.
5. Limits of Political Authority:
Aquinas argued that political authority is not absolute. A ruler’s power is limited by natural law and divine law, and the ruler is morally obligated to govern justly. If a ruler becomes tyrannical or unjust, Aquinas believed that resistance to tyranny could be justified under certain conditions. However, Aquinas did not advocate for rebellion against lawful authority unless it is clear that the ruler is leading society away from the common good and moral law.
Theological Basis for the Relationship:
Aquinas believed that all power, whether temporal or spiritual, ultimately derives from God. However, because people live in both spiritual and material realms, they require institutions that address each aspect of their existence. The Church, guided by divine law, is tasked with the spiritual well-being of humanity, while the State, following natural law, is responsible for earthly matters. This dual role allows the human person to fulfill both their temporal and spiritual needs.
Conclusion:
In summary, St. Thomas Aquinas understood the relationship between the Church and the State as one of cooperation, where each institution fulfills its God-given purpose in a complementary manner. The Church focuses on the salvation of souls through divine law, while the State ensures the common good in the temporal world through natural law. Both authorities should work together for the well-being of individuals and society, but each must respect the boundaries of the other’s domain. While the Church’s spiritual authority is supreme in matters of faith, the State has primary jurisdiction in temporal affairs, provided it governs in accordance with natural law and justice.